Why multi-asset, multi-wrapper control is becoming a strategic capability
Asset managers have added products faster than they have redesigned the operating model behind them. Mutual funds, ETFs and private-market vehicles can now sit side by side, often supported by different systems, data models and workflows. The result is familiar: reconciliation effort, duplicated controls, fragmented reporting and operational friction whenever a new wrapper or strategy is introduced.
The strategic question is no longer whether each vehicle can be run successfully in isolation. It is whether the firm can operate them as one business. Industry research increasingly points to operating-model redesign, technology investment and greater integration between public and private markets as central to that challenge.123
One example is TrussEdge’s Safari platform, which brings together front-, middle- and back-office activity in a single web-based environment, covering order execution, settlement, reconciliation, risk, liquidity, valuation and accounting.
From product launch to daily control
For senior executives, the value of a more integrated platform is less about technology consolidation for its own sake and more about control.
A common data foundation across the investment lifecycle can reduce the number of hand-offs between order management, portfolio management, reconciliation and accounting. It can also make management information more consistent, helping teams identify breaks and exceptions earlier. Deloitte’s recent work on investment-management technology similarly highlights the shift towards modular, scalable platforms and the need to modernise operating models as firms balance cost, regulation and growing complexity.1
TrussEdge’s Safari platform is positioned around this front-to-back model, combining orders, executions and trades with compliance, risk, liquidity, settlement, reconciliation, valuation, accounting and performance.
Supporting the ETF and mutual fund continuum
The ETF market is increasing the pressure on traditional operating models. ETFs introduce intraday dealing, authorised participant connectivity, in-kind creation and redemption, portfolio rebalancing and more frequent data requirements. At the same time, active ETFs and new product structures are expanding the range of strategies that managers need to support. PwC’s 2026 ETF research points to continued growth in ETF assets and significant operating-model change driven by technology and product innovation.2
Within that environment, TrussEdge Safari’s ETF capabilities include an integrated OMS/PMS, automated portfolio rebalancing, iNAV, PCF and PLF calculation, index tracking and configurable UCITS, exposure and risk controls. The ability to manage these functions within the same operating environment as wider portfolio and accounting activity can help reduce the need to build separate processes around each wrapper.
Extending control into private markets
The same principle becomes increasingly relevant as managers expand into private credit, private equity and other less-liquid strategies. Semi-liquid and evergreen structures combine long-duration assets with more frequent dealing, investor communications and explicit liquidity rules. This creates a different operational challenge: commitments, capital calls, distributions, liquidity limits and investor records need to remain aligned with portfolio and cash information.
Oliver Wyman expects the boundary between public and private assets to continue to blur, with better technology supporting the integration of semi-liquid vehicles and private assets into broader portfolios.3 PwC likewise identifies private markets, technology and operating-model transformation as important elements of the industry’s next phase.5
Against that backdrop, TrussEdge’s platform provides a common operating environment across investment, cash, reconciliation, accounting and reporting processes. The proposition is particularly relevant where firms want to add private-market capability without creating a parallel operating architecture.
Operational resilience as a growth enabler
A fragmented stack tends to push exceptions downstream: teams reconcile positions after the fact, investigate breaks across systems and assemble management information from multiple sources. A more integrated architecture can move control closer to the process itself.
That is increasingly important as margins remain under pressure and firms seek to grow without adding operational complexity at the same rate. PwC reports that asset managers continue to face profitability pressure, while Deloitte identifies technology, operating-model change and consolidation as important responses to a more complex market.15
The Safari platform supports automated reconciliation, valuation, accounting and reporting alongside portfolio and trading workflows. The practical benefit is not simply fewer systems; it is the potential to give operating teams a more consistent control environment and senior management a clearer view of where intervention is required.
A platform for scale, not just consolidation
The case for an integrated operating model is therefore not simply “one system instead of several.” It is a way of creating one data foundation and one control framework across a growing product set.
For CIOs, that can support greater flexibility across wrappers and investment strategies. For COOs and CFOs, it can improve visibility over exceptions, liquidity and reconciliations. For boards, the question is more fundamental: can the organisation add products, investors and complexity without adding the same complexity to its operating model?
The broader direction of the market suggests that this question will become more important, not less. As public and private markets converge, ETFs expand and technology reshapes distribution and operations, firms will need operating architectures capable of supporting change without repeatedly rebuilding the foundations beneath the business.235
About Thomas Byrne
Thomas Byrne is Business Development Manager at TrussEdge, with over 20 years of experience across buy- and sell-side firms in sales, trading, and middle- and back-office roles. Since joining TrussEdge in 2018, he has focused on helping investment managers develop practical, tailored solutions across their technology and operational needs.

Independent references
1. Deloitte, Tech Trends 2025 — Investment Management
2. PwC, ETFs 2030: Capitalising on disruptive innovation (2026)
3. Oliver Wyman, 10 Asset Management Trends for 2025
4. Deloitte, 2026 Investment Management Outlook
5. PwC, Next in asset and wealth management 2025

www.trussedge.com I sales@trussedge.com